Thank you for your interest in InPods. Select your role below and the modules relevant to your institution. We will use this information to prepare a customized demo or commercial proposal.

    Your Role

    Select the role that best describes your position.

    This form is designed for institutional leaders, coordinators, and faculty involved in academic quality, examinations, or accreditation decisions.

    If your role is not listed, please share this form with the relevant decision-maker at your institution — such as the Vice Chancellor, Dean, Controller of Examinations, IQAC Director, or NBA Coordinator.

    For general inquiries, contact us at info@inpods.com

    Quick Essentials





    Module Selection

    Select the modules relevant to your institution. Tap a module to select it and reveal detail fields.

    Assessment quality audit, AI-assisted question generation, and AI agent capabilities
    Per Department / Year

    Learn more

    Upload existing question papers — AI maps every question to course outcomes (or competencies for CBME), identifies gaps in CO coverage, Bloom's balance, difficulty distribution, and content scope. Generate attribute-mapped questions from instructional content. Faculty reviews, edits, and approves. Individual faculty can self-register at inpods.ai; enterprise institutions access the same capabilities as integrated quality gates within AQMS.

    Faculty Login IDs needed

    HOD / CoE Audit IDs

    Blueprint-governed assessment quality and process governance
    Per Course / Semester

    Learn more

    Define quality blueprints specifying course outcomes, cognitive levels (Bloom's), difficulty spread, and question-type mix. Generate exam papers governed by blueprints. Role-based workflows: course faculty → reviewer → approver → CoE/Registrar. AI quality gate before printing — no blind approvals. Scale quality governance across 1,000+ courses per semester with reusable templates and full traceability.

    Courses per Semester

    Question Papers per cycle

    Departments

    NMC 2024 competency-based assessment governance for medical institutions
    Per Department / Year

    Learn more

    Purpose-built for medical institutions. Blueprints on NMC competencies and sub-competencies, mapped to phases and postings. Enforce NMC-aligned question-type ratios: MCQ/SAQ/LAQ, case-based, OSCE/OSPE/viva. AQMS blocks generation when ratios are out of tolerance. Every question carries a competency code — visible and auditable. This is not a configuration of general AQMS — it is purpose-built governance for NMC 2024 compliance.

    No. of Departments

    Total Medical Colleges (if University)

    Secure, outcomes-mapped assessment delivery
    Per Student / Test / Semester

    Learn more

    Secure Browser-enabled online tests for internal assessments, quizzes, and continuous evaluation. MCQ and descriptive with rubric-based evaluation. Every question carries outcomes and competency attributes. Outcomes-mapped performance data flows directly into InPods Outcomes for attainment computation. Department-level adoption — co-exists with existing systems.

    Total students taking tests

    Max simultaneous students

    Centralized outcomes data store, nightly computation, and accreditation reporting
    Per Student / Year

    Learn more

    Consolidate fragmented assessment data from all sources into a framework-aligned data store. CO → PO → PSO rollup with affinities and weights. Direct and indirect assessment data separated. Nightly computation across all courses, programs, and cohorts. NBA SAR and NAAC SSR/AQAR reports in the exact formats accreditation bodies prescribe — automated, not manually built. Per-student, per-question, per-assessment-tool attainment granularity.

    Total Students

    Programs

    Courses

    Accreditation management — evidence organization, coordination, and submission
    Per Year / Institution

    Learn more

    Organize NBA criteria and metrics at program level. Assign evidence ownership — who is responsible for which criterion. Link evidence directly from InPods Outcomes. Multi-level review: department → school → university. SSR text professionalization for clarity and consistency. Cycle-to-cycle continuity: when the accreditation coordinator leaves, the institutional knowledge stays. Structured workflows, role-based ownership, and historical evidence trails ensure the institution remembers — not just the individual.

    Programs

    Accreditation Target

    Provide Additional Details (Optional)






    Select all that apply


    We will respond within 2 business days. All information is kept confidential.

    Scroll to Top