Accreditation coordination

Accreditation Management System (AMS).

One system for two accreditation realities: NBA SAR at the program level and NAAC SSR/AQAR at the institutional level—organizing evidence, workflows, and approvals at scale.

Two buyers · One platform

Program directors

NBA SAR coordination for each program.

NBA

IQAC officers

NAAC SSR + yearly AQAR continuity.

NAAC

Two buyers. Two problems. One governance platform.

Buyer path 1 · NBA SAR

For Program Directors (autonomous & affiliated)

Organize NBA criteria/metrics, assign ownership, link evidence, track reviews, and preserve continuity across cycles so SAR preparation is repeatable—not a one-time heroic effort.

Criterion-aligned structure for SAR.
Evidence linked to each metric.
Role-based contribution and approvals.
Cycle-to-cycle data continuity.

Buyer path 2 · NAAC SSR/AQAR

For IQAC officers (large universities)

Centralize data collection, manage multi-level reviews from department → school → university, and ensure year-over-year continuity for AQAR and SSR submissions.

SSR preparation every cycle.
AQAR yearly submissions.
Workflow governance across units.
Institutional memory despite staff turnover.

What AMS does (and does not) do

Governance and memory, not computations or exams

AMS organizes accreditation data, evidence, workflows, and approvals. It does not compute attainment values
(the Outcomes product does that) and does not design exams (AQMS does that).

Can AMS be used only for NBA or only for NAAC?

Yes. AMS supports each independently. Institutions can start with their most urgent need and extend to the other when ready.

Does AMS replace a generic document repository?

AMS goes beyond storage by providing structured metrics, ownership, workflow governance, approvals, and cycle continuity— purpose-built for accreditation submissions.

Testimonials

AMS

“

Coordinating NAAC SAR and AQAR data across multiple schools and departments was our most stressful institutional process. With AMS, over 100 faculty now upload data against structured criteria and metrics. We have completed multiple accreditation cycles with organized evidence and consistent workflows. The InPods team customized AMS to match our organizational structure and supported us through every submission.

IQAC Officer, Health Sciences University (multi-school)

Request an AMS Demo →

AMS

“

Our biggest fear with NAAC AQAR was continuity — every time a coordinator changed, institutional memory was lost and we scrambled to reconstruct evidence. AMS gave us structured workflows with role-based ownership, so data continuity no longer depends on any single person. Our annual AQAR process is now predictable and audit-ready, regardless of staff changes.

IQAC Director, Large Autonomous University